IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• MUST implement AES-CBC for IPsec ESP
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: [EAI] Last Call: draft-ietf-eai-framework -- editor's notes
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis (HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis (HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion(Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [EAI] Last Call: draft-ietf-eai-framework (Overview and Framework for Internationalized Email) to Informational RFC
  • From: Randall Gellens
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-deployments (Deployment Considerations for lemonade-compliant Mobile Email) to BCP
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Last Call: draft-heard-rfc4181-update (RFC 4181 Update to Recognize the IETF Trust) to BCP
  • From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
• Re: Intermediate wg summaries
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Intermediate wg summaries
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: lconroy
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis (HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: lconroy
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Identifying mailing list for discussion (Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Nelson, David
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis (HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: draft-harrington-text-mib-doc-template (A Template for Documents Containing a MIB Module) to BCP
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: addressing Last Call comments
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis (HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria]
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• IETF Trust FAQ
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard (Vacaciones)
  • From: Sergio Anibal Landro
• Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-10.txt
  • From: William Allen Simpson
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call comment destination (Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria])
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria]
  • From: David Kessens
• Last Call comment destination (Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria])
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria]
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X(ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Markus Hofmann
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: Last Call: draft-legg-xed-asd (Abstract Syntax Notation X (ASN.X)) to Proposed Standard
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria]
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria]
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• addressing Last Call comments [Re: "Discuss" criteria]
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Barry Leiba
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Markus Hofmann
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Stecher,Martin
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Design Summaries (Re: Intermediate wg summaries)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Design Summaries (Re: Intermediate wg summaries)
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Intermediate wg summaries
  • From: Bob Braden
• Design Summaries (Re: Intermediate wg summaries)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Jane 1593 Proposed ID design for TEXAS Drivers licence; holographic-CODE
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: was Re: Intermediate wg summaries
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Intermediate wg summaries
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Intermediate wg summaries
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Intermediate wg summaries
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Intermediate wg summaries
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Notice of Copyright for OIEAU
  • From: Kyse Faril
• RE: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes
  • From: Simon Josefsson
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: NABBLE NOTIFICATION forCopyright Notice: N R M E F 4 N Y N O S (NRMEF4NYNOS)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: NABBLE NOTIFICATION forCopyright Notice: N R M E F 4 N Y N O S (NRMEF4NYNOS)
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: NABBLE NOTIFICATION forCopyright Notice: N R M E F 4 N Y N O S (NRMEF4NYNOS)
  • From: Ross Finlayson
• Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-opes-smtp-security (Integrity, privacy and security in OPES for SMTP) to Informational RFC
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• NABBLE NOTIFICATION forCopyright Notice: N R M E F 4 N Y N O S (NRMEF4NYNOS)
  • From: Kyse Faril
• NABBLE NOTIFICATION forCopyright Notice: N R M E F 4 N Y N O S (NRMEF4NYNOS)
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes [Was: When is a DISCUSS really a discussion?]
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Copyright Notice: N R M E F 4 N Y N O S (NRMEF4NYNOS)
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Copyright Notice: NRMEF4NYNOS
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• RE: [FW: Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• When is a DISCUSS really a discussion?
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: [FW: Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
  • From: Yoshihiro Ohba
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• New mailing list: language for IETF state machines
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: [FW: Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• [FW: Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
  • From: Yoshihiro Ohba
• RE: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Away on vacation [Re: Posting of draft-ietf-mip4-mobike-connectivity-02.txt ]
  • From: Levkowetz <henrik
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Dave Crocker
• I invented GOOGLE?
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Present from the ITU
  • From: Carl Malamud
• Re: "Discuss" criteria status
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Present from the ITU
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Yoshihiro Ohba
• RE: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Narayanan, Vidya
• Re: "Discuss" criteria status
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Kyse Faril
• WHOIS is now AAAQ.com?
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: Prague (Praha) street maps and hotels (was Re: IETF 68 hotel full)
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: John C Klensin
• 2006 IPv4 Address Use Report
  • From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• RE: IESG Success Stories (was: "Discuss" criteria)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: John Leslie
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: IESG Success Stories (was: "Discuss" criteria)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Lisa Dusseault
• Re: IESG Success Stories (was: "Discuss" criteria)
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: IESG Success Stories
  • From: Julian Reschke
• RE: IESG Success Stories (was: "Discuss" criteria)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• IESG Success Stories (was: "Discuss" criteria)
  • From: Michael Thomas
• RE: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Joel M. Halpern
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• RE: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Scott O. Bradner
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [eap] [FW: Re: Please review -- IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• RE: Prague (Praha) street maps and hotels (was Re: IETF 68 hotel full)
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Yoshihiro Ohba
• Re: [FW: Re: [eap] Please review -- IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
  • From: Yoshihiro Ohba
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Tom.Petch
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Yoshihiro Ohba
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: [FW: Re: [eap] Please review -- IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
  • From: Jari Arkko
• FYI: Last Call for "Independent Submissions to the RFC Editor"
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• [OT] Looking for a program which generates binary formats decoders from a high-level description
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Fred Baker
• [FW: Re: [eap] Please review -- IETF Last Call ondraft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt]
  • From: Yoshihiro Ohba
• "Discuss" criteria
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Present from the ITU
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: IETF last call on draft-barany-eap-gee-04.txt
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• Re: Network Services RFP for IETF Meetings
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Re: Network Services RFP for IETF Meetings
  • From: David Morris
• Network Services RFP for IETF Meetings
  • From: Ray Pelletier
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-radext-filter-06.txt
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farah-adntf-adns-guidelines-02.txt
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farah-adntf-adns-guidelines-02.txt
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-farah-adntf-adns-guidelines-02.txt
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Prague (Praha) street maps and hotels (was Re: IETF 68 hotel full)
  • From: Elwyn Davies
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IETF 68 hotel full
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Nomcom06: IAB Member Candidate Feedback
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-terrell-cidr-net-descrpt-expands-iptx-add-spc-11.txt
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Nomcom O6 categories -- GEN == Chair?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IETF 68 hotel full
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Nomcom06: IAB Member Candidate Feedback
  • From: Lyndon Nerenberg
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: IETF 68 hotel full
  • From: John Levine
• Re: IETF 68 hotel full
  • From: Andy Bierman
• RE: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
  • From: Markus.Isomaki
• Re: IETF 68 hotel full
  • From: Andrew G. Malis
• Re: IETF 68 hotel full
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: IETF 68 hotel full
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Nomcom O6 categories -- GEN == Chair?
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Nomcom 06 feedback kudos
  • From: Dave Crocker
• IETF 68 hotel full
  • From: Andy Bierman
• Re: Nomcom O6 categories -- GEN == Chair?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Nomcom O6 categories -- GEN == Chair?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• CAPWAP Interim Meeting, January 24th & 25th
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
  • From: Doug Ewell
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• nomcom:Soliciting feedback from entire working groups?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• HOKEY interim meeting on January 23rd
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
  • From: Julian Reschke
• Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Bill Fenner
• Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
  • From: Henrik Levkowetz
• Re: ion-ion-format open for public comment
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Fred Baker
• FW: VCF required: TEXT MESSAGING FEATURE / No risk ALL returns
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: ion-ion-store open for public comment
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Autoreply: away from desk
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: adoption times (was Re: DNS Choices)
  • From: John Levine
• RE: adoption times (was Re: DNS Choices)
  • From: Edward Lewis
• draft status links on the wg pages?
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: [secdir] Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: [secdir] Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Vishwas Manral
• Re: [secdir] Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: [secdir] Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Russ Housley
• Re: Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• RE: adoption times (was Re: DNS Choices)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• adoption times (was Re: DNS Choices)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Review of draft-manral-ipsec-rfc4305-bis-errata-02.txt
  • From: Nicolas Williams
• Re: Welcome to the "Ietf" mailing list
  • From: borincanias
• Re: A plea for subject line sanity (RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-01.txt
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• RE: A plea for subject line sanity (RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: A plea for subject line sanity (RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Nelson, David
• Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-01.txt
  • From: Adrian Farrel
• A plea for subject line sanity (RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Peter Sherbin
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Peter Sherbin
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Peter Sherbin
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-call-01.txt
  • From: Suresh Krishnan
• Questions about far end table defined in RFC2495/3895
  • From: James Chen
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: John Levine
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: David Morris
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: David Morris
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Nelson, David
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: David Morris
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Second call for nominations: IAOC position selected by the IAB
  • From: Lucy Lynch
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Ralph Droms
• Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
  • From: jarno.rajahalme
• RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Hesham Soliman
• Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Thomas Narten
• RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: James Carlson
• Non-terminal-wildcards Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Ralph Droms (rdroms)
• RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Soliman, Hesham
• Re: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
  • From: Scott W Brim
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: John L
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Dave Crocker
• DOMAIN DISPUTES: BIG STAR OLD NAVY BAOZI BAIDU GREEN SWASTIKA SAILOR MOON
  • From: Kyse Faril
• DOMAIN DISPUTES: BIG STAR OLD NAVY BAOZI BAIDU GREEN SWASTIKA SAILOR MOON
  • From: Kyse Faril
• BAOZI BAIDU Thank you for your Open Forum submission.
  • From: Kyse Faril
• RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• RE: Interworking between 2 different vendors' Softswitches
  • From: Livingood, Jason
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Interworking between 2 different vendors' Softswitches
  • From: Ramirez, Luis
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: ken carlberg
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Carl Malamud
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Geoff Huston
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Joe Abley
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Janet P Gunn
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Patrick Vande Walle
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Henk Uijterwaal
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Henning Schulzrinne
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Karl Auerbach
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Simon Leinen
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: John Levine
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Brian Rosen
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: IM and Presence history
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Can't VPN (OT)
  • From: Rachel Florentine
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IM and Presence history
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Steven M. Bellovin
• Fwd: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• IM and Presence history
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Emin Gun Sirer
• Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: Joe Baptista
• Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: Peter Dambier
• Re: do it yourself roots, was Something better than DNS?
  • From: John Levine
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Patrick Vande Walle
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Patrick Vande Walle
• Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Eric Burger
• Re: IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
  • From: Doug Barton
• BaoZi.org vs BaiDu.com INFRINGEMENT CLAIM (ARCHIVES)
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Baidu.com vs BAOZI.org (Hu Nu An Wen?)
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Possible INFRINGEMENT... 'BAIDU.com' et al ("CHINA's GOOGLE")
  • From: Kyse Faril
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
  • From: Jari Arkko
• IANA media type registry vs RFC4288
  • From: Julian Reschke
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Peter Dambier
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Olaf M. Kolkman
• Re: [arch-d] Last Call comments on draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-05 ORCHID
  • From: Pekka Nikander
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: David Conrad
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Paul Robinson
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Fixing Email administration (including TLS) Was SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Dave Cridland
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Douglas Otis
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Michael Thomas
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Something better than DNS?
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re:Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Paul Robinson
• RE: New RR problem not evidence that DNS needs to be replaced (was Re:SRV records considered dubious)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Tony Finch
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Replacing email protocols: First comes consensus on the requirements
  • From: Dave Crocker
• New RR problem not evidence that DNS needs to be replaced (was Re: SRV records considered dubious)
  • From: Ofer Inbar
• Something better than DNS?
  • From: Pekka Savola
• The 'failure' of SMTP RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: william(at)elan.net
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• SMTP compared to IM (Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Mark Andrews
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: David Conrad
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: SRV records considered dubious
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Mark Andrews
• SRV records considered dubious (was: Re: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys)
  • From: Keith Moore
• DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Douglas Otis
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Robert Elz
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Stephen Farrell
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Robert Elz
• RE: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' toProposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Draft minutes of Wednesday plenary
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Michael . Dillon
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Brian F. G. Bidulock
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Curtis Villamizar
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Robert G. Cole
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Curtis Villamizar
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Curtis Villamizar
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Patrik Fältström
• RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)
  • From: Cullen Jennings
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Bernard Aboba
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Russ Housley
• RE: Last Call: 'Guidance for AAA Key Management' to BCP (draft-housley-aaa-key-mgmt)
  • From: Alper Yegin
• Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Clint Chaplin
• RE: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
  • From: Michel Py
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Fred Baker
• RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet EmergencyPreparedness (ieprep)
  • From: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS