Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> there is no incentive I can see to transition to the pure IPv6
> state and release the IPv4 addresses.
Just FYI,
INTERNET DRAFT M. Ohta
draft-ohta-address-allocation-00.txt Tokyo Institute of Technology
Geoff Huston
Telstra Corporation
Masaki Hirabaru
Merit Network, Inc.
Jun Murai
Keio University
May 2000
Usage Based Address Allocation Considered Harmful
The More Restricted Assignment Plan
No IPv4 address space should be allocated to an ISP, unless the
ISP support fully operational fully transparent IPv6 service with
at least 64K IPv6 subnets to all the end users.
Masataka Ohta
PS
Your mistake is insisting on release of IPv4 addresses, even though
exhaustion of IPv4 addresses is an incentive for IPv6 transition.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf