Doug Ewell scripsit: > Since tags of 1 character are never well-formed, I suggest that the > definition: > > SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..60)) > > be amended to exclude the 1-character case. I assume that a zero-length > tag, while also not defined in RFC 4646, was included in the I-D to > allow the special case of "no tag." AFAIK, ASN.1 does not allow sizes like (0, 2..60). I wouldn't even bother with this change. -- John Cowan cowan@xxxxxxxx http://ccil.org/~cowan Rather than making ill-conceived suggestions for improvement based on uninformed guesses about established conventions in a field of study with which familiarity is limited, it is sometimes better to stick to merely observing the usage and listening to the explanations offered, inserting only questions as needed to fill in gaps in understanding. --Peter Constable _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf