Re: Protest: Complexity running rampant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 19, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
My attention has recently been drawn to this set of documents:

- draft-legg-xed-asd
- draft-legg-xed-asd-gserei
- draft-legg-xed-asd-xerei
- draft-legg-xed-rxer
- draft-legg-xed-rxer-ei

It's, as far as I can tell, an attempt at a complete reimplementation of ASN.1 using XML.

Stepping away from the details of the implementation, let me ask what the result is? (note that I am not an apps person, and have no skin the the game, and therefore am asking a question trying to get to the root here)

There are any number of structured data representations around; ASN.1 and XML are two, and one could consider the structure used in RFC 2445 as a third example. People have shied away from ASN.1 citing complexity. Whatever its warts, XML is pretty readily understood.

Having not read the above and not really caring much what happens in the layers up in the stratosphere as long as its designers don't by its sheer weight make the application unusable, is it a bad thing to provide the expressive nature of ASN.1 in a human-readable and popular data representation?

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]