Re: Atompub WG activity (Last Call: draft-ietf-atompub-protocol to Proposed Standard)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



While it is definitely true that there has been a lot of good feedback,
it would still be good to at least start broadening the net and get
feedback from the larger IETF community.

- James

Julian Reschke wrote:
> [snip]
> + 0,5.
> 
> The document got lots of constructive feedback in the previous weeks
> (mainly due to fresh eyes), and I think it would be worthwhile to
> resolve most of the issues that were raised before doing the Last Call.
> This will save lots of time spent by new reviewers raising new issues.
> 
> Best regards, Julian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]