--On Thursday, 08 February, 2007 03:34 -0500 Jari Arkko
<jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for your note John. Let me also emphasize the need for
> these two drafts to be synchronized. Last calling draft-iesg
> at this time was made in part because we wanted to get the
> two in sync. I think we are more or less in sync but the
> remaining input should come from the community.
>
> As for the list to use for discussion -- sending mail to the
> iesg list only would indeed be one way. The discussion list
> we are on right now seems more suited, no?
Sure. But my point in that area was obviously not clear. Prior
to the announcement of the Last Call, there was no indication to
the community that this document should be considered and
discussed, much less where. There is no working group charter,
no history of open discussion, and so on. And _that_ calls for
a four-week Last Call, not two weeks.
regards,
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf