-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > We have IPv6 Locally Assigned Local Addresses. Doesn't this presume that if people used these locally assigned addresses they would then NAT to a public address space? I think the main thing folks might miss is that a lot of people really want all of this on a single address--while having multiple addresses concurrent on a single machine is acceptable for larger machines, specifically servers, having multiples on a single host as a general rule hasn't met with much in the way of acceptability for the vast majority of hosts. At least that's what I'm hearing. :-) Russ - -- riw@xxxxxxxxx CCIE <>< Grace Alone -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7CNVER27sUhU9OQRAqf0AKCZuM30XPZO5SUYkFKpuueq3q/MIQCg/5k1 TeUcUHxrrjd755ovY1cG1/E= =i0+D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf