RE: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Tag MIB) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi -

>From: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Feb 11, 2007 4:15 AM
>To: 'John Cowan' <cowan@xxxxxxxx>, Doug Ewell <dewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: ietf-languages@xxxxxxxx, LTRU Working Group <ltru@xxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Last Call: draft-mcwalter-langtag-mib (Language Ta	g MIB) to Proposed Standard
>
>Hi,
>
>Right - ASN.1 doesn't allow discontinuous integer ranges.
...

No.  In a SIZE qualifier, a discontiguous range is perfectly
legal ASN.1   There are examples of this in RFC 2579,
among others.  In this particular case, something like

SYNTAX      OCTET STRING (SIZE (0 | 2..60))

(replacing 60 with whatever the consensus upper bound
should be) would seem appropriate.

Randy

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]