RE: NATs as firewalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Monday, 05 March, 2007 09:15 -0800 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip"
<pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
>> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> 
>> John,
>> 
>> (after also reading Michael's response)
>> 
>> I don't disagree. I think there is scope for writing a list 
>> of desirable properties for SOHO routers in the light of 
>> these various inputs. I'm less certain it can be done for 
>> enterprise boundary routers. But it would be a tricky and 
>> contentious job in both cases. Even draft-ietf-v6ops-nap took 
>> many moons and several major editing passes, and it only 
>> starts the work.
> 
> SOHO is the one that won't get done otherwise. The enterprise
> folk have Gartner, Burton and the Jericho forum to express
> their list of requirements through (and the RFP process to put
> those requirements on the vendor product roadmaps).
> 
> From the SOHO perspective I have been saying for years now
> that many of the problems we have wit bots would be
> significantly reduced if SOHO routers and cable modems came
> configured with an outbound firewall by default.
>...

While I have disagreed with many of the other things Phillip has
said in this thread, I am in complete agreement with this one
and taken much the same position for some time.  Indeed, I have
long suspected that the highest-leverage remedy for many spam
and malware issues would start with considering ISPs who supply
SOHO and, even more important, residential, connections without
supplying or requiring such firewalls at the boundary to be
liable for the damage that results.

While an IETF Standard specifying the capabilities such a
firewall should have and how it should be configured is neither
necessary nor sufficient to hold ISPs to that level of
accountability and liability, it would certainly be a very
useful step to clearly establish the requirements and their
importance.   While I don't think the IETF list is the right
place to try to sort out Philip's specific configuration
suggestions, I note that none of the mass-market inexpensive
devices sold as "Cable/DSL Routers" or firewalls (at least those
I'm aware of) are even capable of being configured to do the
type of outbound rate limiting that he suggests.

    john


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]