> -----Original Message----- > From: James Carlson [mailto:james.d.carlson@xxxxxxx] > I've read through the document as well as (most of) the mailing list > discussion, and I don't see anything that directly addresses one > possible issue here. > > That issue is the exclusive use of IPv4 or IPv6 on Packet CS. Why > must it be exclusive? The first four bits of the datagram tell you > conclusively whether you're looking at IPv4 or IPv6, so why is strict > segregation needed? > > Can't both run on the same link? For that matter, why was this same segregation standardized for Ethernet? I always wondered about that. Bert _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf