RE: NATs as firewalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The FCC digital TV guideline is a bad example. There is no credibility in a plan that says that the govt. is going to cut off their primary means of outreach to voters. 

The networks know that and are acting accordingly.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Staff [mailto:nick.staff@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 11:16 PM
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: NATs as firewalls
> 
> > From: David Morris [mailto:dwm@xxxxxxxxx] On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Nick 
> > Staff wrote:
> > 
> > > I think the thing that would help IPv6 the most would be 
> the setting
> > of a
> > > hard date when no new IPv4 addresses would be issued.  This would
> > make it
> > > real for everyone and ignite the IPv6/IPv4 gateway market 
> (I think).
> > Not to
> > > mention we'd never have to have another debate over when IPv4 was
> > going to
> > > run out which might be benefit enough in itself  ;)
> > 
> > What a lawsuit mess that would be ... artificial limits would never 
> > work.
> 
> I think the US FCC Digital Broadcast Deadline is a good 
> example - though more drastic than I was suggesting.
> 
> I think artificial limits are inevitable unless the intention 
> is to support
> IPv4 until there's no one left in the world who wants to use 
> it (and even
> that is an artificial limit).   I also don't understand what 
> is gained by a
> sliding doomsday other than procrastination, avoidance, and a 
> neutered stimulus.  I mean if IPv4 addresses are going to run 
> out wouldn't it be better to know exactly when?  In my 
> opinion you make it real if you give it a date but until then 
> it's like saying "smoking may cause cancer".  If any smoker 
> knew for a fact that the next drag on a cigarette would give 
> them cancer they'd never smoke again.  If a network manager 
> knew that in 7 years all new address space would be IPv6 it 
> would become a consideration from that point forward.  In my opinion.
> 
> Nick 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]