<Pasi.Eronen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> My TLS co-chair suggests that this document should go forward as >> Experimental. I see two problems with that. First: it assigns code >> points out of a space which is reserved for Standards Action. > > A correction: the draft needs code points from two different > registries (TLS extension types and TLS supplemental data type); > both of these registries have at least part of the numbers reserved > for "IETF Consensus" policy. So Standards Action is not needed. I have to agree with my co-chair and disagree with myself. :) A standards action is not needed... -Ekr _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf