Re: Last Call: draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines (Guidance on AreaDirector Sponsoring of Documents) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




- I'm lost about why we would continue to publish Informational process RFCs (ignoring any existing pipeline of process documents remaining to be published as RFCs).

To me the argument for making this one an RFC is mainly that it
fits together with the two other drafts mentioned previously,
which pretty clearly need to be RFCs. But it wouldn't give me
any heartburn if the community consensus is to make it an ION.

    Brian

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]