On 2/23/07, Adrian Farrel <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The reference to RFC3986 includes "..., Was Internet-Draft ...." It is unusual to include reference to the I-D that has subsequently become an RFC. Probably best just to leave this text out. Ditto RFC3305, RFC3414, and RFC3415.
Sorry, this one is my fault - I generate a set of include files for xml2rfc that has nearly all of the info that I know about a document, which I built to try to help me notice (if I ever read the references section of my own documents) when I've accidentally referred to an I-D that's been published or obsoleted, etc etc. David used them (I'm actually a bit curious how, I do make them available for rsync but I didn't think I had told anyone about that) and so got the extra info. He's taken kind of a beating for it so I feel particularly bad. Bill _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf