Dave Crocker wrote:
Fred Baker wrote:
is it a bad thing to provide
the expressive nature of ASN.1 in a human-readable and popular data
representation?
The one thing IETF standardization certainly ought to imply is that
there is a real constituency interesting in using the specification in
the near-term.
Who wants to use this spec, now, and why?
I almost sent an email asking this question when I read the drafts.
My reaction was "This seems like a lot of stuff to put on the
standards track without being the output of a WG."
I didn't, because I figured there must be some significant
constituency that wants this standardized. So, is there or not?
d/
Andy
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf