And we should ask this question every time we see an informational process
RFC last call...
The best reason to publish a process document as an RFC is because it will
be a BCP (IONs aren't BCPs). Since this one won't be a BCP, and given that
guidance could change over time, I'd think an ION is more reasonable.
Thanks,
Spencer
On Wednesday, February 07, 2007 10:20:54 AM -0500 The IESG
<iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Internet Engineering Steering
Group (iesg) to consider the following document:
- 'Guidance on Area Director Sponsoring of Documents '
<draft-iesg-sponsoring-guidelines-01.txt> as an Informational RFC
This document looks good to me. However, I am compelled to ask why it
should be published as an Informational RFC instead of as an ION.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf