RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-ltans-ers (Evidence Record Syntax (ERS)) to Proposed Standard - comment from Tim and answer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Comment to the draft received from Tim Polk during review:

> I thought I might follow up on the first unaddressed comment:
> 
> I notice that the phrase "the Initial Archive Timestamp" frequently 
> appears in the text with a capitalized 'I' in word "initial".  This
seems 
> to indicate that there *is* something special about this timestamp,
and I 
> would expect to find a definition in the terminology section.
> 
> Perhaps a lowercase 'i' would more clearly indicate that it is simply
a 
> subtype with the same structure?  That is, if the phrase was "the
initial 
> Archive Timestamp", I would only expect to find "Archive Timestamp" in
the  
> terminology section.  (Actually, the phrase appears with a lowercase
'i' 
> twice - once in section 1.2 and again in 5.2.  I assume there is no 
> difference?)
> 
> Thanks,
>
> Tim Polk

Answer from I-D author:
> Hi Tim,
> 
> I agree with you, and follow your comment and will make sure in the
final 
> revision of the draft that the word "initial" of the "initial Archive 
> Timestamp" only starts with a capital letter at the beginning of a 
> sentence.
> 
> Thanks, Tobias


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]