Brian E Carpenter schrieb:
On 2007-03-13 20:43, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
The text that got used in CalDAV (which is about to be published) is:
o MUST support transport over TLS [RFC2246] as defined in [RFC2818]
(note that [RFC2246] has been obsoleted by [RFC4346]);
with 2246, 2818 and 4346 all normative references. These type of
"up-references" are not ideal and I believe there was some discussion
going on somewhere about how better to deal with this type of situation.
...
As pointed out before, that text really is confusing. As a reader. I'm
left wondering whether I need to implement RFC2246 or RFC4346. Or both?
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf