Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> writes: > Brian E Carpenter schrieb: >> On 2007-03-13 20:43, Cyrus Daboo wrote: >>> The text that got used in CalDAV (which is about to be published) is: >>> >>> o MUST support transport over TLS [RFC2246] as defined in [RFC2818] >>> (note that [RFC2246] has been obsoleted by [RFC4346]); >>> >>> with 2246, 2818 and 4346 all normative references. These type of >>> "up-references" are not ideal and I believe there was some >>> discussion going on somewhere about how better to deal with this >>> type of situation. >> ... > > As pointed out before, that text really is confusing. As a reader. I'm > left wondering whether I need to implement RFC2246 or RFC4346. Or both? I wish I knew the answer to this question as well... :) Seriously, we're shortly going three separate versions of TLS standardized, 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2, plus SSLv3. So, the question of what to require implementors to do is a tricky one that actually doesn't have that much to do with TLS :) -Ekr _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf