Re: Proceeding CDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: iad@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proceeding CDs
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:49:49 +0000
Authentication-results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=stbryant@xxxxxxxxx; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4526990D.7010208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

Is there strong rationale for maintaining production of the CDs?


No.
IMO, free online retrieval of IETF proceedings is sufficient.
Spend the time and money on something more important.


I agree.

- Stewart

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Proceeding CDs
  - From: IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Proceeding CDs
  - From: Andy Bierman

Prev by Date: RE: comments on draft-houseley-aaa-key-mgmt-07.txt
Next by Date: Protest: Complexity running rampant
Previous by thread: Re: Proceeding CDs
Next by thread: Re: Proceeding CDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]