Re: NATs as firewalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael,

On 2007-03-02 16:19, michael.dillon@xxxxxx wrote:
...
No real disagreement here but I do see a way forward. First, clarify the
terminology. Second publish a pair of RFCs rather like 1009 entitled
"Requirements for Consumer Internet Gateways" and "Requirements for
Enterprise Internet Gateways".

Are you aware of RFC 4084 "Terminology for Describing Internet Connectivity"?

It is a rather different take on the same problem.

    Brian


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]