Hi Dave, Brian, Regarding one point regarding the WG status pages on the tools servers: on 2006-12-19 15:51 Dave Crocker said the following: [...] >>> 3. Remove the documents list from the WG charter page, since it is >>> redundant with the Status page and less complete. >> >> However, it contains different information - it "knows" which drafts are >> official WG drafts, and it includes "obsoleted by/ updated by" information >> for RFCs. > > Good point. Then I suggest that the Tools folks upgrade the Status page to > include those features. Right. The tools pages also knows about which drafts are official WG drafts. Non-Wg drafts are listed in a separate section at the bottom. It is however not plainly stated that one group is WG drafts and the other isn't; I'll fix that. Regarding the obsoleted/updated-by annotation for the RFCs, that's a very good point. I'll add that information. Henrik _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf