John L wrote:
ICANN has not to date dealt very effectively with these issues, but
they are real issues that will have a great effect on people who use
the DNS every day, and they're not technical issues, since all of the
alternatives are equally feasible technically.
At its base, IDN is a technical matter. That is the realm of the
IETF, not ICANN. ICANN can deploy and administer solutions developed
in the IETF, but it cannot create them. That's not its job and it's
not its skillset.
There are both technical issues and non-technical issues. The technical
issues of mapping Unicode to DNS are indeed the IETF's problem. But
assuming we solve that, there's considerably more to deploying IDNs.
For example, what homograph rules apply to what domains? Are the rules
per-TLD or some other granularity? What are the appropriate rules for
GTLDs, since they don't have a native language other than the de-facto
English? If there are new TLDs with translations of existing TLD names.
e.g., business in Arabic and Chinese, are these aliases for .COM or
.BIZ, or are they different? If people have registered ASCII
approximations of names, e.g., letters without diacriticals, do they get
first crack at the correctly spelled IDN with the diacriticals?
In that context, RFC 4690 is thought-provoking.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf