Sam Hartman wrote:
However the IETF as a hole is an excellent resource for taking a look in situations where more eyes are required. An example of this is when there is a minority who is unhappy with the consensus or when there are specific issues we want greater review on.
1. There are important differences between "getting greater review" and "getting IETF-wide rough consensus". For example, one is an analysis process, while the other is a decision-process.
2. What are some examples of a demonstrated IETF-wide consensus against work submitted to the IESG? What improvements resulted?
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf