Dave Crocker writes:
Eric Gray (LO/EUS) wrote:
Interestingly enough, your observation provides the strongest
argument I've yet seen for assigning a standard number to any
RFC that has becomes a Proposed Standard.
Well, it's a double-edged capability. All of the concerns about
citing "the latest version" rather than a specific version are
entirely warranted...
We have STD numbers already. There's only one catch: The internet runs
on proposed standards, not STDs.
Arnt
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf