RE: DNS Choices: Was: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> policies regarding cost and "authentication".  In that regard,
> snail-mail is not a very good analogy for e-mail discussions.

The basic premise is all the same: user -> need to send -> delivery charge.
Fee collector does not matter: US Post, UPS, FedEx, DHL, Purolator or ISP.

--- "Nelson, David" <dnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Phillip Hallam-Baker writes...
> 
> > I agree that this demonstrates that the 'charge per email' 
> > schemes that people have don't work.
> 
> I'm not so sure about that.  The fact that there is a real cost
> certainly changes the dynamics of unsolicited mail, as well as the
> business model of the purveyors.  Cost factors will not eliminate it,
> but it might improve the "quality" of the offers and reduce the quantity
> of messages.
> 
> > But if postal mail recipients could impose filters they would.
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> > And there is in point of fact an entire police force tracking 
> > down scam artists using the postal mail.
> 
> Right.
> 
> One additional distinction is that most unsolicited mail in the US
> (typically called junk mail) is mailed at discounted bulk postage rates.
> In order to mail at bulk rates, an organization needs a permit from the
> post office.  This involves some level of "authentication".  Of course,
> mail sent at first class or second class postage rates can be sent
> anonymously.  However, I get very (very) few pieces of junk mail sent at
> first or second class rates.  It's all bulk rate mail.  This is another
> example of the cost of mailing driving the behavior set.
> 
> A second distinction is that the US Postal System (in the US) is a
> government sanctioned monopoly, and in many countries the postal system
> is still a government agency.  When you have a single entity acting as
> the receiver of all outgoing mail, it makes it much easier to enforce
> policies regarding cost and "authentication".  In that regard,
> snail-mail is not a very good analogy for e-mail discussions.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]