Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Trying to enforce that a Turing-complete machine have capabilities "no greater than X" might seem to an IT senior manager to be a really good idea, but in practical terms, it can't be done.

Of course it can.
Simply put a trustworthy computing partition on the machine. Palladium is more than capable of providing a proof that would be prohibitively expensive to defeat.
I, and others, dispute that such "proofs" are proof of anything really meaningful, and that defeating them would be "prohibitively expensive to defeat". But that is territory that is emphatically not part of the work of this
 group.

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]