>>>>> "Susan" == Susan Thomson (sethomso) <sethomso@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Susan> Hi Vidya Inline ...
>> -----Original Message----- From: Narayanan, Vidya
>> [mailto:vidyan@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006
>> 2:15 AM To: iesg@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx Cc: nea@xxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint
>> Assessment (nea)
>>
>> All,
>>
>> This charter is definitely clearer on some of the points that
>> were discussed based on the last version, but a couple of
>> things still remain to be clarified. Based on several
>> discussions that we've had lately, I have two suggestions for
>> further clarity:
>>
>> 1. Let's add the text suggested by Harald and Lakshminath
>> (there seemed to be agreement on this text on the
>> list). Quoting the change proposed:
>>
>> Replace:
>>
>> "NEA can be limited in its applicability when the endpoint and
>> the organization providing network access are owned by
>> different parties."
>>
>> with
>>
>> "NEA is applicable to computing environments of enterprises
>> where endpoints accessing the enterprise's network are owned
>> and/or expected to conform to the policies set forth by the
>> organization that owns and operates the network. All other
>> cases are outside the scope of the NEA charter, since we do not
>> know that NEA would be useful in such cases."
>>
Susan> I don't think there is consensus around this text, and I
Susan> can think of existing deployment scenarios that might be
Susan> ruled out by this text and also where it might be
Susan> considered to be too broad.
Ah. Count me as one in favor of the text (although I do not object to
the old text). I didn't speak up because I thought there was
consensus.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf