Keith Moore wrote:
I just don't think that IETF meeting attendance is an appropriate way to decide who is a nutcase and who isn't.
Me too. That'd be a move towards paid membership IMO and as was shown with the recent NomCom selection, the record keeping involved can lead to disputes. If we take this apporach, (and I don't care really), then something based on ever having written an RFC or an expired WG I-D would be better; maybe combined with not having been barred from posting to an (unrelated to the appeal) IETF list in the recent past. The person could still be a nutcase, but at least they'd be a bona-fide IETF nutcase:-) S. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf