Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 Dave - this really says nothing about what a liaison does or what their
responsibilities are. The IS-IS document talks to some extent about the
processes but the roles are still unclear.

My point was that the liaison is a businesses development role really. Its
about how IETF processes and IPs are bridged and promulgated into other
works as the basis of fact for our areas of expertise.

I also see this role as a member of the brand-protection team, another thing
the IETF might think about bringing on board.

T.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Crocker" <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Scott Bradner" <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: I understand that there is an ISO MOU with the IETF- ...


>
>
> Scott Bradner wrote:
> > see RFC 3563 for one agreement
>
> And since it would seem a bit useful to make liaison information readily
> available, I was happy to fine:
>
>     <http://ietf.org/liaisonActivities.html>
>
> It seems to cover the topic rather thoroughly.  it looks as if it links to
the
> formal agreements, no?
>
> d/
> -- 
>
>    Dave Crocker
>    Brandenburg InternetWorking
>    bbiw.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]