On 11/5/06 at 2:38 PM -0800, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 11/4/06 at 4:04 PM -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
Questions abound around the mechanisms for sending an email and
ensuring that it is delivered in a stated time interval on the
order of minutes or that an indication of failure is returned to
the sender...
That, in particular, seems like a relatively easy extension to RFC
3461 (by adding some sort of additional parameter value to DELAY).
Not exactly rocket science. Not exactly requiring spinning up a WG.
And as someone kindly pointed out to me (thanks Philip), we already
have that extension in RFC 2852 which defines said mechanism (thanks
Chris).
pr
--
Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf