ken> Interestingly enough, the work that you mention below in your
ken> original posting...
ken> ... rfc-4542, rfc-4411, and draft
ken> -ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signal-preemption (along with some other
ken> related work) has actually not been done in IEPREP because
ken> the group was not allowed to consider solutions. Instead,
ken> some of the work has been pushed to TSVWG, to the groans and
ken> sometimes confusion of some of the participants of that
ken> group, who wondered what the subject of prioritization had to
ken> do with TSVWG. Part
I think the work you cite belongs in tsvwg. AT least 4542 and
vpn-signaling-preemption.
I mentioned the above as examples, not as a case-by-case examination
of what should or should not be in IEPREP. But along those lines,
rfc-4542 (titled "Implementing an Emergency Telecommunications
Service"), where ETS was first established in IEPREP and the draft
deals with priority and preemption, seems odd to me to be in TSVWG.
But if you feel differently, then we agree to disagree.
ken> of the revised charter is meant to
ken> remove this obstacle.
Which work would be permitted under the revised charter that is
currently udone elsewhere? I may have more concerns about the revised
charter than I thought I did.
I am not speaking of any specific work other than what has been
discussed in the proposed re-charter. to consider otherwise is to go
beyond what I stated.
ken> Also, as Scott Brimm has mentioned, there is a proposed
ken> liaison from the ITU to work with the IETF, with one of the
ken> working groups of interest being IEPREP. It would seem
ken> odd to close down the group and punt the subject to them when
ken> they are approaching "us" for assistance If IEPREP is
ken> closed, does that mean the subject gets pushed over to TSVWG?
that rather depends on what question they're asking, now doesn't it?
IF they're asking for enhancements to RSVP to deal with some ETS
issues, then yes, I'd hope the work would be done in tsvwg. That way,
ETS requirements can be balanced against other requirements. If they
want to change SIP, I'd hope that it would go through sipping and
eventually sip.
we will have to wait to see what they request. all I stated was that
they were coming to us and that it was odd to close down a group they
were interested in working with. Anticipating hypotheticals are not
useful because they can put us down a rat hole that may or may not
have substance.
-ken
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf