I strongly support this document for publication as a BCP.
IMO, it eliminates an extremely problematic mechanism described in
RFC 3683, and it provides a much more reasonable alternative through
its updates to RFC 2418 and 3934. I think that publishing this draft
would save the IESG and the community much effort and difficulty in
the future.
Margaret
On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:19 PM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to
consider
the following document:
- 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions '
<draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-01.txt> as a BCP
This document abolishes the existing form of indefinite Posting
Rights Action and restores the previous option of finite posting
rights suspensions authorized by an Area Director. It obsoletes
RFC
3683 and updates RFC 2418 and RFC 3934.
Publication of this document will classify RFC 3683 as historic.
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
iesg@xxxxxxxx or ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2006-09-25.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-
rescind-3683-01.txt
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf