RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: "Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s@xxxxxxx>

    > I am somewhat surprised that no-one has actually answered the question
    > why DO we use a noncom rather than open elections?

Acually, several people have. Fred Baker recently (13 Sep 2006 04:26:30) made
a post which made a very good analysis of this point, and one of mine
discussed it as well, early in the thread (5 Sep 2006 11:34:43).

There are a variety of reasons, above the one you cited (packing); my personal
favourite is one several people mentioned (less politics), but I think perhaps
the most useful one in practise is another one which I mentioned earlier:

    >> Rather than having everyone spend ten minutes on deciding who to
    >> select, a subset (which the random draw hopefully makes reasonably
    >> representative of the group as a whole) does a more in-depth and
    >> thought-through selection.

	Noel

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]