Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
	[..]
Campaigns can be a pain, but they do have positive attributes. People
who have to campaign for a position are forced to think about the
contribution they intend to make, they have to set out a program of
action, they have to communicate it to the electorate.

Alternatively, we could come up with a scheme where a randomly selected (and
nominally representative) group evaluates the demonstrated track record of
individuals up for consideration. This would focus attention on 'doers' rather
than 'intenders'. It seems strangely familiar, but I can't quite put my finger
on what such a process would be called....

cheers,
gja


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]