Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process ratherthan some

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Really - so where is the magic list of all barred members?

Todd
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim Chown" <tjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process
ratherthan some


> Isn't he barred from posting here?
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:51:27PM -0700, todd glassey wrote:
> > I am forwarding this on behalf of Dean Anderson.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > --Dean
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> > >
> > > >     > From: "todd glassey" <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > >     > Why cant the IETF and IESG Embrace open elections
> > > >
> > > > Because the members are generally happy with the system we have now.
> > It's
> > > > called democracy - and you're outvoted.
> > >
> > > I think that in fact, members aren't very happy with the system that
we
> > > have now. If they were happy, they wouldn't be changing it.
> > >
> > > I think that the system has created a very closed, and very unfair
> > > management selection process that is not benefiting the members are
> > > large, but benefiting a few private interests.
> > >
> > > > Remember, we had this system for quite a while before the last major
> > rework
> > > > of the process (i.e. we'd all seen it in action for some years, and
were
> > able
> > > > to judge how well was working), and the outcome of that rework was a
> > > > standards document - i.e. something suject to community approval,
i.e.
> > > > democracy - which made adjustments, but retained the basic
framework. If
> > > > people weren't generally happy with that basic framework, it would
have
> > been
> > > > obvious at the Last Call of the document.
> > > >
> > > > IMO, the IETF has some significant problems, but the process for
> > selecting
> > > > people for leadership positions isn't one of them.
> > >
> > > I think the IETF and ISOC do have some very significant problems, and
> > > that those problems are primarilly mismanagement, disloyalty, and
> > > improper use of the ISOC/IETF/IESG/IAB to benefit the personal and
> > > adverse interests of the management. The ISOC/IETF employees have
> > > accrued some torts against the organization for defamation and
> > > defamatory false reports of member misconduct.
> > >
> > > There is plenty of documentation now of disloyalty, fraudulent
> > > misrepresentation, collusion, and bad faith.  To see a little bit,
look
> > > at the Appeal submitted recently to the IAB:
> > >
> > >
> >
http://www.av8.net/IETF-watch/Appeal_of_IESG_decision_of_July_10_2006-v4.pdf
> > > or
> > >
> >
http://www.av8.net/IETF-watch/Appeal_of_IESG_decision_of_July_10_2006-v4.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- 
> > > Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
> > > www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
> > > 617 344 9000
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
> -- 
> Tim/::1
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]