Now Todd, you must admit that this is true. You are no more chartered
to protect the Internet than IESG is. So why isn't your existence here,
by your own criteria, unwarranted overhead?
Keith
-------- Original Message --------
Kieth - abusive language for the purpose of being abusive is prohibited on
these lists. Take this as a formal complaint to the Chair over this action.
Todd Glassey
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "todd glassey" <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Eliot Lear" <lear@xxxxxxxxx>; "IETF Discussion" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: what happened to newtrk?
Eliot - the problem quite simply is that the IESG needs to be disbanded.
It
serves no other purpose than to complicate the creation and acceptable
vetting models for Internet Standards and as such really needs to be a
thing
of the past - The standards process is easily updated to remove the IESG
from the process and since they are not chartered to protect the
Internet
their existence at all is unwarranted overhead and control of political
issues within the Internet as a whole and as such totally inappropriate
anymore.
s/the IESG/Todd Glassey/g
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf