Sam Hartman wrote: [definition of interoperability] > As discussed in a recent IESG appeal, it's not clear that > we have a clear statement of our interoperability goals. > There's some text in section 4 of RFC 2026, but we seem to > actually want to go farther than that text. [...] > If people would find this useful I can try to write text. If you have something in mind, sure, it would be very useful. And not necessarily limited to Brian's draft, it's also related to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.general/19269 Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf