Hello Frank, Yes, there has been some feedback and additional discussion posted to the atom-syntax list, part of which covers this new section. That forum would likely be the best place to discuss. That said, however, good suggestion. Thank you for taking a look. - James Frank Ellermann wrote: > James M Snell wrote: > >> a primary goal of mine is to remain consistent with rfc4287. > > Hi, I've seen the "post last call" update (draft -08) triggered > by the GenArt review, where you say "are not legally binding". > > How about "might be not legally binding" ? "Are not" sounds > like "forget it". > > Frank (IANAL) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf