feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James M Snell wrote:

> a primary goal of mine is to remain consistent with rfc4287.

Hi, I've seen the "post last call" update (draft -08) triggered
by the GenArt review, where you say "are not legally binding".

How about "might be not legally binding" ?  "Are not" sounds
like "forget it".

Frank (IANAL)



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]