James M Snell wrote: > let me know if this is an improvement Hard to judge, now that I know what it's supposed to do it's "obvious"... :-) I think it's clearer now: Jane's feed is "by+nc", the example entry is "by", and so a commercial service can copy this entry as long as the author (Jane) is credited. If that's correct I got it. Unrelated minor point, you have "MUST NOT contain more than one with the same combination of href and type attribute values." Is that the same as "more than one license relation with the same combination of href and type attribute values is pointless" ? If yes you could eliminate the MUST NOT. ...or maybe not, I just see that RFC 4287 has a similar MUST NOT about rel="alternate" (that's even the default relation), odd. RFC 4287 states that the IANA registry should be BELOW http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/ , it's now IN http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations.html I wonder if I should change rel="bookmark" to rel="self" on ordinary Web pages. Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf