Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 10:16:11AM -0700, todd glassey wrote:
> For instance - would Harald H ever let me run an initiative through IPR? -
> not a chance and his refusal to allow me to file my drafts under his WG is a
> violation of the IETF charter, and tortuous interference by he and the IESG
> to prevent me from 'changing how the IETF operates'.
> 
> The issue is that Peer-Review without proper oversight is an invitation to
> fraud and tortuous interference with others initiatives and the IETF is hip
> deep in the middle of it IMHO
> 

Todd,
	You've been warned that further outbursts containing
unprofesisonal and ad hominem messages would result in your being
banned from the IETF list.

	In my and Jordi's opinion this message has crossed the line
after repeated warnings, and so you have been banned from posting to
the IETF list for the period of 1 week.  Further violations will
increase the period during which your postings will be banned
exponentially.  (i.e., 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, etc.)

	Regards,

						- Ted

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]