Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Nelson, David [mailto:dnelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 

> I think NOMCOM is like a Representative Town Meeting, in 
> which the representatives are chosen by a random selection 
> process, rather than by election.  The outcome, which 
> supports in-depth consideration and substantial, informed 
> debate, is much the same.

The NOMCON process is certainly grounded in academic theories of governance that were popular in the 80s. Many of them attempt to provide a practical implementation of Rawl's theory of justice.

The problem I see is NOT who gets elected but the lack of authority and mandate. The reason that the time spent on NEWTRACK was wasted is that nobody feels that they have a mandate to change anything.

As a result the IETF is a standards body with 2000 active participants that produces on average less than 3 standards a year and typically takes ten years to produce even a specification. 

 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]