IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
- RFP and BCP addition - receipt needs to be generated & RFC's that revise IETF process.
- Re: draft-jennings-impp-vcard-07
- Re: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-laganier-ipv6-khi
- re: administrative question on RFC publications
- Re: New Version Notification - draft-laganier-ipv6-khi-04.txt
- draft-jennings-impp-vcard-07
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
- Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
- Re: Last Call: 'A Lightweight UDP Transfer Protocol for the the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-crisp-iris-lwz)
- Re: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license)
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Autoreply: away from desk
- re: administrative question on RFC publications
- RFP Question for you Jorge... did anyone put a notice of "Responsibility for Copyright Violations" to the Publisher RFP Candidates?
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: administrative question on RFC publications
- Re: administrative question on RFC publications
- Re: administrative question on RFC publications
- Re: administrative question on RFC publications
- Re: administrative question on RFC publications
- administrative question on RFC publications
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- RE: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt]
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-rescind-3683-00.txt
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RE: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
- RFC 4612 - historic status
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- RE: [INDEP] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: pet request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- pet request (was Re: draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt)
- draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt
- 16ng Interim - September 12-13, Frankfurt
- From: Soohong Daniel Park
- Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- RE: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Middlebox Communication' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-midcom-mib)
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications
- Re: Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications
- Clustered Signaling Gateways specifications
- From: Satya Prasad Nemana
- Level Compression Recovery
- Re: Document Action: 'Requirements for IETF Technical Publication Service' to Informational RFC
- Autoreply: away from desk
- RFC Editor RFP Announcement
- Re: Terms used in rules-update-07
- RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
- Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Reque
- Re: Novell IETF bag
- Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)
- Re: Last Call: 'Document Shepherding From Working Group Last Call to IESG Approval' to Informational RFC
- Re: Novell IETF bag
- Re: Novell IETF bag
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- RE: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
- Proposal for slightly modified vetting commitment.
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: regarding Editors and their 'recreating new ip'...
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Draft minutes from General Area open meeting
- Draft Wednesday plenary minutes
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- regarding Editors and their 'recreating new ip'...
- Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- RE: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
- Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- Mandatory numeric examples in crypto-RFCs?
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- RE: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- OT - Post-SOX Thinking in US Public Companies (was Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL)
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- Re: Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Flaw in the NOTEWell System makes NOTEWELL NOTWELL
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12
- Re: [Ietf-caldav] Last Call comment on Etag requirements in draft-dusseault-caldav-12
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
- RE: Meetings in other regions
- Re: Minutes and jabber logs
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- Re: Minutes and jabber logs
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
- Re: Meetings in other regions
- Re: Meetings in other regions
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Novell IETF bag
- Re: netwrk stuff
- Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
- Re: IANA, Unicode, and the multilingual Internet
- RE: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
- RE: Minutes and jabber logs
- Re: Meetings in other regions
- RE: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
- Re: Meetings in other regions
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RFC Editor RFP Review Request
- From: IETF Administrative Director
- RE: Meetings in other regions
- Re: netwrk stuff
- Re: Meetings in other regions
- Re: netwrk stuff
- Re: Meetings in other regions
- IANA, Unicode, and the multilingual Internet
- Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles
- Re: Meetings in other regions
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles
- Re: Appeals, post-appeal discussions, DoS attacks on the IETF, and the depth of turtles
- Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]