IETF Discussion

• Thread Index

• RE: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• IPv6 communication
  • From: thekkayil.joy
• Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames)
  • From: Spencer Dawkins
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Theodore Tso
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Carl Malamud
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Carl Malamud
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open ElectionProcess [...])
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: todd glassey
• Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Constant flux (was: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process [...])
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: Rob Evans
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Theodore Tso
• appeals
  • From: JFC Morfin
• Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: C. M. Heard
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Ned Freed
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RE: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Christian Huitema
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: RFC 2195
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RFC 2195 (Was: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Kurt D. Zeilenga
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses
  • From: Marshall Eubanks
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: bmanning
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: bmanning
• Re: [mpls] Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2)
  • From: George Swallow
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test) (2)
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: RFC Editor RFP Responses
  • From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
• Re: Last Call: 'Label Switching Router Self-Test' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-self-test)
  • From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Ralph Droms
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RFC Editor RFP Responses
  • From: rpelletier
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Volunteer needed to serve as IANA charset reviewer
  • From: Ted Hardie
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Eliot Lear
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Ned Freed
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• RFC 2195 (was Re: what happened to newtrk?)
  • From: Alexey Melnikov
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RE: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Pasi.Eronen
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Edward Lewis
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Lars Eggert
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Decision to Reset the NomCom Process
  • From: Andrew Lange
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Randy Presuhn
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Richard Shockey
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: feed-license-08
  • From: James M Snell
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Theodore Tso
• feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license))
  • From: Frank Ellermann
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to belackofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Al Arsenault
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• RE: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations'to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Sandy Wills
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Lakshminath Dondeti
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• RE: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Jari Arkko
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: John C Klensin
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Robert Sayre
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Adjusting the Nomcom process
  • From: Dave Crocker
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communication here...
  • From: Fleischman, Eric
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Stewart Bryant
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Keith Moore
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackof communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lackofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Michael Thomas
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Noel Chiappa
• Re: what happened to newtrk?
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• what happened to newtrk?
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Eliot Lear
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: John C Klensin
• RE: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack ofcommunicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Andrew Newton
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Thomas Narten
• Re: www.ietf.org unresponsive over IPv6?
  • From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
• IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Brian Carpenter
• Re: Size of pool (Was: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...)
  • From: bmanning
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Sam Hartman
• Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Bill Fenner
• NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: todd glassey
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Jefsey_Morfin
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Pekka Savola
• Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• Re: IESG response and questions to the normative reference experiment (draft-klensin-norm-ref-01.txt)
  • From: Brian E Carpenter
• RE: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
  • From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip