Fedora Packaging
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Customizing Fedora Installer
- Re: Customizing Fedora Installer
- Customizing Fedora Installer
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Re: Best practices for packaging logfiles
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Best practices for packaging logfiles
- Re: Best practices for packaging logfiles
- Re: Requires(hint):
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Best practices for packaging logfiles
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Package Revision Needed
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Package Revision Needed
- From: Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Re: Requires(hint):
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Troubles with the .desktop file
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Troubles with the .desktop file
- Re: Requires(hint):
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Requires(hint):
- Requires(hint):
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Why is hard-wired version dependency required by Packaging/Tcl?
- Re: Adding mod_proxy_html to httpd package?
- Re: Unclear in the use of %doc
- Re: Unclear in the use of %doc
- Re: Non-UTF8 gzipped manpages
- Re: Non-UTF8 gzipped manpages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Non-UTF8 gzipped manpages
- Re: Unclear in the use of %doc
- Re: Unclear in the use of %doc
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Unclear in the use of %doc
- Re: Menu entries
- From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
- Menu entries
- Mounting Problem...
- Adding mod_proxy_html to httpd package?
- Re: More alternatives fun and games
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- More alternatives fun and games
- Re: How to package EPEL packages
- How to package EPEL packages
- Re: Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
- Re: Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
- Re: Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
- Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
- Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Re: New package help
- From: Juan Carlos Cornejo
- Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Re: Python Virtual Provides
- running testsuites of packages
- Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Re: Python Virtual Provides
- Python Virtual Provides
- Re: New package help
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: New package help
- Re: New package help
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: New package help
- New package help
- From: Juan Carlos Cornejo
- Re: Haskell packages
- Re: Missing FPC meeting
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Missing FPC meeting
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Missing FPC meeting
- Re: TeX package naming
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Haskell packages
- TeX package naming
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Haskell packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: New name for dhcp-3.0.5-42.fc7.src.rpm
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- New name for dhcp-3.0.5-42.fc7.src.rpm
- Re: Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
- Re: Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
- Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
- Re: No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
- clarification about the DraftsTodo table to edit
- Re: No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
- Re: No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
- No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: eclipse plugin without feature.xml
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- CMake link to upstream documentation added
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
- file-not-utf8 complaints
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- eclipse plugin without feature.xml
- Re: Re: How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
- Re: How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
- Re: How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
- How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
- Re: shipping distribution-specific patches *separately*
- Re: shipping distribution-specific patches *separately*
- shipping distribution-specific patches *separately*
- My absence at yesterdays FPC meeting
- Re: Using alternatives
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- [Fwd: [JPackage-discuss] Moving jpp# to Provides:]
- Re: Using alternatives
- Re: Using alternatives
- Re: Using alternatives
- Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- Using alternatives
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: New packager question
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: jpp naming exception
- Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- Re: jpp naming exception
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- jpp naming exception
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- Re: New packager question
- Re: New packager question
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- Broken dependency /bin/sh?
- Re: New packager question
- Re: New packager question
- Re: New packager question
- Re: New packager question
- Re: New packager question
- Re: New packager question
- Re: New packager question
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- New packager question
- Re: Retrograde package version
- Re: Retrograde package version
- Re: Retrograde package version
- Re: Retrograde package version
- Re: Retrograde package version
- Retrograde package version
- SELinux Policy
- Updates to R packaging spec
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: python packaging - icons/desktop files and /usr/bin accessibility
- Re: python packaging - icons/desktop files and /usr/bin accessibility
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: desktop file validation
- Re: desktop file validation
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
- Re: Copyrighted specfiles.
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Copyrighted specfiles.
- Copyrighted specfiles.
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: desktop file validation
- Re: desktop file validation
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
- FPC Members: Possible times
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- New Fedora Packaging Committee Members
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: desktop file validation
- desktop file validation
- Packaging/SysVInitScript reload() bug
- Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
- Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
- Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
- Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
- Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
- From: Sérgio Durigan Júnior
- Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
- 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
- From: Sérgio Durigan Júnior
- Re: Lua
- Re: Lua
- GCJ Clarification (was Re: More Java guidelines questions)
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
- updated ProvidesList proposal
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- Static Library Policy Draft Changes
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location - deemed not that useful ;-(
- Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location - deemed not that useful ;-(
- Re: Packaging/SysVInitScript wiki page has wrong description for LSB header Required-Stop:
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Packaging/SysVInitScript wiki page has wrong description for LSB header Required-Stop:
- Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- Re: Lua
- Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- My comments about the Java packaging guidelines draft
- Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
- Re: Lua
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Lua
- Re: Lua
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Lua
- Re: Lua
- Re: Lua
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Lua
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Let's discuss... Javascript!
- Re: Let's discuss... Javascript!
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Let's discuss... Javascript!
- Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
- Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
- Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
- Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
- Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
- Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: one more draft
- Re: Re: one more draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: one more draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: one more draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Java packaging guidelines draft
- Re: one more draft
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: one more draft
- Re: one more draft
- Re: Re: one more draft
- Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
- Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: one more draft
- Re: Re: one more draft
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: one more draft
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: one more draft
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- /srv (was: one more draft)
- Re: a proposal to register virtual provides
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- one more draft
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: crypto in fedora
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: crypto in fedora
- Re: crypto in fedora
- Re: crypto in fedora
- Re: crypto in fedora
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: crypto in fedora
- Re: crypto in fedora
- Re: crypto in fedora
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
- Re: crypto in fedora
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Drafts for next Tuesday
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- crypto in fedora
- Re: a proposal to register virtual provides
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- a proposal to register virtual provides
- Re: UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: RFC: mass rebuild results
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: RFC: mass rebuild results
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
- Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
- Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
- Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
- --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- Re: Couple of things I'd like to discuss at tomorrow's Fedora Packaging meeting
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Couple of things I'd like to discuss at tomorrow's Fedora Packaging meeting
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- Couple of things I'd like to discuss at tomorrow's Fedora Packaging meeting
- rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
- Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
- Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
- Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Some licenses which need checking
- Some licenses which need checking
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- [SPAM] Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Packaging J2ME java midlets for Fedora. Is it possible ?
- Packaging J2ME java midlets for Fedora. Is it possible ?
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
- Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Re: Requires(missingok)
- Requires(missingok)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: packaging ramspeed, which uses the "The Alasir Licence" (TAL)
- packaging ramspeed, which uses the "The Alasir Licence" (TAL)
- Packaging truecrypt for Fedora (licencing question)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: how to handle mimetype
- Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: Packaging ncdu for Fedora
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Packaging ncdu for Fedora
- Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
- Re: %bits macro?
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- how to handle mimetype
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- Re: %bits macro?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- %bits macro?
- Re: Perl package guidelines and filtering provides/requires
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: Perl package guidelines and filtering provides/requires
- Re: Perl package guidelines and filtering provides/requires
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Perl package guidelines and filtering provides/requires
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
- Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
- [SPAM] Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
- handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- Re: UTF-8 package names
- UTF-8 package names
- Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
- Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
- Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
- Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
- Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
- recent TeX Live packaging changes
- libcap and dbus?
- Re: Re: compat package policy
- Re: Re: compat package policy
- Re: Re: compat package policy
- Re: Re: compat package policy
- Re: compat package policy
- Re: compat package policy
- Re: compat package policy
- Re: compat package policy
- Re: compat package policy
- compat package policy
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- Re: Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
- Re: Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
- Re: Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
- Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- Re: Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
- Re: Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- Re: Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- java: building from source vs signed .jar's
- Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
- Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
- Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Re: OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
- OCaml "LGPLv2 with exceptions" - what should be in the License field?
- Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
- Duplication of documentation in subpackages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Package naming help, please
- Re: Package naming help, please
- Re: Package naming help, please
- Re: Package naming help, please
- Package naming help, please
- Re: alsa-plugins-a52 in Fedora 8?
- alsa-plugins-a52 in Fedora 8?
- Re: Ada packages
- Re: Ada packages
- Re: Ada packages
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- GGZ Draft guideline
- Re: Ada packages
- Re: Ada packages
- From: Tom "spot" Callaway
- Ada packages
- Re: python-svn build failed on koji
- Re: python-svn build failed on koji
- Re: python-svn build failed on koji
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
- python-svn build failed on koji
- Re: speech-dispatcher packages
- speech-dispatcher packages
- [Fwd: Re: Lisp packaging draft]
- Re: rpc service description headers packaging
- rpc service description headers packaging
- Re: pike packages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- pike packages
- Re: help on PreReq and trigges for texinfo
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- help on PreReq and trigges for texinfo
- Re: tex/latex doc install location
- Re: tex/latex doc install location
- Re: tex/latex doc install location
- Re: tex/latex doc install location
- Re: tex/latex doc install location
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Conditionally building a sub-package?
- Re: Reviewing an existing package with major changes
- Re: Conditionally building a sub-package?
- Re: Reviewing an existing package with major changes
- From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite Forum]
[KDE Users]