Fedora Packaging

• Thread Index

• Regarding PHP guidelines -- pear packages
  • From: Rakesh Pandit
• Re: Early MinGW packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Early MinGW packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Chuck Anderson
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Chuck Anderson
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Tom Lane
• desktop file icon/pixmap locations
  • From: Chuck Anderson
• Re: Fonts packaging amendment
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Re: Fonts packaging amendment
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Fonts packaging amendment
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fonts packaging amendment
  • From: Rex Dieter
• New Lisp packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Anthony Green
• Fonts packaging amendment
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Submission of Haskell Packaging Guidelines for Review
  • From: Yaakov Nemoy
• Re: Submission of Haskell Packaging Guidelines for Review
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Submission of Haskell Packaging Guidelines for Review
  • From: Yaakov Nemoy
• Re: Re: Ownership of /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: [fedora-java] Re: Ownership of /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Ownership of /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• [Fwd: Ownership of /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms]
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Ownership of /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Ownership of /etc/maven/fragments and /usr/share/maven2/poms
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Packaging of Nagios
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Packaging of Nagios
  • From: Matthew Jurgens
• [Fwd: Packaging of Nagios]
  • From: Matthew Jurgens
• Packaging of Nagios
  • From: Matthew Jurgens
• Re: Re: moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Chris Spencer
• Re: moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Re: moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Chris Spencer
• Re: moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Chris Spencer
• Re: moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• moc, moc-qt4?
  • From: Chris Spencer
• Re: Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Customizing Fedora Installer
  • From: Amir Franco Joven
• Re: Customizing Fedora Installer
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Customizing Fedora Installer
  • From: Amir Franco Joven
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: Best practices for packaging logfiles
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Best practices for packaging logfiles
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Best practices for packaging logfiles
  • From: Enrico Scholz
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Best practices for packaging logfiles
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Package Revision Needed
  • From: Debarshi Ray
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Package Revision Needed
  • From: Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Troubles with the .desktop file
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Christopher Stone
• Troubles with the .desktop file
  • From: Henrique Junior
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Requires(hint):
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Requires(hint):
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Why is hard-wired version dependency required by Packaging/Tcl?
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Adding mod_proxy_html to httpd package?
  • From: Philip Prindeville
• Re: Unclear in the use of %doc
  • From: Andrew Bartlett
• Re: Unclear in the use of %doc
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Non-UTF8 gzipped manpages
  • From: Andrew Bartlett
• Re: Non-UTF8 gzipped manpages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Non-UTF8 gzipped manpages
  • From: Andrew Bartlett
• Re: Unclear in the use of %doc
  • From: Andrew Bartlett
• Re: Unclear in the use of %doc
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Unclear in the use of %doc
  • From: Andrew Bartlett
• Re: Menu entries
  • From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
• Menu entries
  • From: Henrique Junior
• Mounting Problem...
  • From: Shobhit Gupta
• Adding mod_proxy_html to httpd package?
  • From: Philip Prindeville
• Re: More alternatives fun and games
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• More alternatives fun and games
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: How to package EPEL packages
  • From: Dan Horák
• How to package EPEL packages
  • From: Gregory Hosler
• Re: Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Creating a mailinglist for discussions about Fedora and openSUSE package guidelines merging
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New package help
  • From: Juan Carlos Cornejo
• Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• running testsuites of packages
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: David Malcolm
• Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: David Malcolm
• Re: Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Python Virtual Provides
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New package help
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: New package help
  • From: Seth Vidal
• Re: New package help
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: New package help
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• New package help
  • From: Juan Carlos Cornejo
• Re: Haskell packages
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Missing FPC meeting
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Missing FPC meeting
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Missing FPC meeting
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: TeX package naming
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Haskell packages
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• TeX package naming
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Haskell packages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: New name for dhcp-3.0.5-42.fc7.src.rpm
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• New name for dhcp-3.0.5-42.fc7.src.rpm
  • From: artem rus
• Re: Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Unifying Fedora and openSuse packaging guidelines, rpmmacros and scriplets
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
  • From: Izhar Firdaus
• clarification about the DraftsTodo table to edit
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
  • From: Paul Howarth
• No build ID note found - how to resolve this?
  • From: Izhar Firdaus
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: eclipse plugin without feature.xml
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• CMake link to upstream documentation added
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• file-not-utf8 complaints
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• eclipse plugin without feature.xml
  • From: Sergio Pascual
• Re: Re: How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
  • From: Michał Bentkowski
• Re: How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
  • From: Michelle Konzack
• Re: How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
  • From: Remi Collet
• How to make SRPMs and RPMs?
  • From: Michelle Konzack
• Re: shipping distribution-specific patches *separately*
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: shipping distribution-specific patches *separately*
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• shipping distribution-specific patches *separately*
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• My absence at yesterdays FPC meeting
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Using alternatives
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• [Fwd: [JPackage-discuss] Moving jpp# to Provides:]
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Using alternatives
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Using alternatives
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Using alternatives
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Till Maas
• Using alternatives
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: jpp naming exception
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: jpp naming exception
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Till Maas
• jpp naming exception
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Roland Wolters
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Broken dependency /bin/sh?
  • From: Roland Wolters
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Gregory Hosler
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Gregory Hosler
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Gregory Hosler
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Zing
• Re: New packager question
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• New packager question
  • From: Gregory Hosler
• Re: Retrograde package version
  • From: W. Michael Petullo
• Re: Retrograde package version
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Retrograde package version
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Retrograde package version
  • From: W. Michael Petullo
• Re: Retrograde package version
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Retrograde package version
  • From: W. Michael Petullo
• SELinux Policy
  • From: Nigel Jones
• Updates to R packaging spec
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: python packaging - icons/desktop files and /usr/bin accessibility
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: python packaging - icons/desktop files and /usr/bin accessibility
  • From: Mary Ellen Foster
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: desktop file validation
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: desktop file validation
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Policy question: how tight should cross-subpackage Requires be?
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Copyrighted specfiles.
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Copyrighted specfiles.
  • From: Brad Bell
• Copyrighted specfiles.
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: desktop file validation
  • From: Matthias Clasen
• Re: desktop file validation
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Etiquette for contacting a package maintainer?
  • From: Timothy Selivanow
• FPC Members: Possible times
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• New Fedora Packaging Committee Members
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: desktop file validation
  • From: Rex Dieter
• desktop file validation
  • From: Christopher Aillon
• Packaging/SysVInitScript reload() bug
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
  • From: Sérgio Durigan Júnior
• Re: 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
  • From: Rex Dieter
• 32- and 64-bit softwares living together
  • From: Sérgio Durigan Júnior
• Re: Lua
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Lua
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• GCJ Clarification (was Re: More Java guidelines questions)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Jarod Wilson
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Denis Leroy
• Re: forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• forbid fedora or redhat in spec files?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• updated ProvidesList proposal
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: orion
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Brian Pepple
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Static Library Policy Draft Changes
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location - deemed not that useful ;-(
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location - deemed not that useful ;-(
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Packaging/SysVInitScript wiki page has wrong description for LSB header Required-Stop:
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Packaging/SysVInitScript wiki page has wrong description for LSB header Required-Stop:
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Lua
  • From: Michel Salim
• Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
  • From: Hans de Goede
• My comments about the Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Suggestion: require inclusion of cvs location in completed review request
  • From: David Timms
• Re: Lua
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Lua
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Lua
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Lua
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Lua
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Lua
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Lua
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Let's discuss... Javascript!
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Let's discuss... Javascript!
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Let's discuss... Javascript!
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Meeting Reminder: April 1, 2008
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: one more draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: one more draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesus M. Rodriguez
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: one more draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Mary Ellen Foster
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Thomas Fitzsimmons
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Thomas Fitzsimmons
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Thomas Fitzsimmons
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Deepak Bhole
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: one more draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Java packaging guidelines draft
  • From: Andrew Overholt
• Re: one more draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: one more draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: one more draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: one more draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
  • From: Jesse Keating
• http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ASCIINaming amended
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: one more draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: one more draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: one more draft
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: one more draft
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• /srv (was: one more draft)
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: a proposal to register virtual provides
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• one more draft
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: crypto in fedora
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Drafts for next Tuesday
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• crypto in fedora
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: a proposal to register virtual provides
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• a proposal to register virtual provides
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Robert P. J. Day
• Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Robert P. J. Day
• Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• any reason why "sdcc" package transforms pgms to non-standard names?
  • From: Robert P. J. Day
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: RFC: mass rebuild results
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: RFC: mass rebuild results
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Chuck Anderson
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• FESCo notes on OCaml guidelines change
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Mary Ellen Foster
• Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
  • From: Till Maas
• --excludedocs and packaging guidelines?
  • From: Warren Togami
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Couple of things I'd like to discuss at tomorrow's Fedora Packaging meeting
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Couple of things I'd like to discuss at tomorrow's Fedora Packaging meeting
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Couple of things I'd like to discuss at tomorrow's Fedora Packaging meeting
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• rpaths to libraries in non-standard locations (libperl.so in particular)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Hans de Goede
• UPDATED: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Some licenses which need checking
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Some licenses which need checking
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Brad Bell
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Bruno Postle
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• [SPAM] Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: Packaging J2ME java midlets for Fedora. Is it possible ?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Packaging J2ME java midlets for Fedora. Is it possible ?
  • From: Mike F
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Blocking reviews on to be written guidelines?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Requires(missingok)
  • From: seth vidal
• Requires(missingok)
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: packaging ramspeed, which uses the "The Alasir Licence" (TAL)
  • From: Rex Dieter
• packaging ramspeed, which uses the "The Alasir Licence" (TAL)
  • From: Thorsten Leemhuis
• Packaging truecrypt for Fedora (licencing question)
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: how to handle mimetype
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Packaging ncdu for Fedora
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Packaging ncdu for Fedora
  • From: Richard Fearn
• Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• New draft packaging guidelines for OCaml
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• how to handle mimetype
  • From: Tanguy Eric
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Jeremy Katz
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: %bits macro?
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• %bits macro?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Perl package guidelines and filtering provides/requires
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: Perl package guidelines and filtering provides/requires
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Perl package guidelines and filtering provides/requires
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Perl package guidelines and filtering provides/requires
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
  • From: Rex Dieter
• [SPAM] Re: handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• handing files under $HOME directory on scriptlet
  • From: Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Peter Gordon
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• are subpackages required for optional loadable libraries?
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: seth vidal
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Matthias Saou
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: UTF-8 package names
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• UTF-8 package names
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: recent TeX Live packaging changes
  • From: Jonathan Underwood
• recent TeX Live packaging changes
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• libcap and dbus?
  • From: Roland Wolters
• Re: Re: compat package policy
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: compat package policy
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Re: compat package policy
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Re: compat package policy
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: compat package policy
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: compat package policy
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: compat package policy
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: compat package policy
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: compat package policy
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• compat package policy
  • From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
• Re: Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
  • From: Ed Hill
• Re: Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
  • From: Patrice Dumas
• Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Policy on packages whose source files require a login to download
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Ville Skyttä
• Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Axel Thimm
• Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Jesse Keating
• Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Tom "spot" Callaway
• java: building from source vs signed .jar's
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
  • From: Debarshi Ray
• Re: Duplication of documentation in subpackages
  • From: Patrice Dumas