On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 17:24 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Actually a whole pile of stuff has changed then. > > One of the action items from the conference call I attended recently > was that Fernando would actually document the reasons why we needed > (and, perhaps, still need) the jpp tag. If for no other reason than > we'll actually know. One reason that I recall heading during the > conference was the need to be able to easily query for all of the java > packages on the system in some manner, and we have better query tools > now (along with packagekit to abstract this kind of thing). Perhaps > someone else who was on that call (Jesse?) can say whether I'm > misremembering. > > But it's certainly a reasonable time to revisit the issue, although > it's going to be tough to discuss much without that documentation > about the reasons for the tag. You got it right Jason, thanks! -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
