>>>>> "NM" == Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: NM> I don't see what changed since the discussion on NM> JPackageNaming Actually a whole pile of stuff has changed then. One of the action items from the conference call I attended recently was that Fernando would actually document the reasons why we needed (and, perhaps, still need) the jpp tag. If for no other reason than we'll actually know. One reason that I recall heading during the conference was the need to be able to easily query for all of the java packages on the system in some manner, and we have better query tools now (along with packagekit to abstract this kind of thing). Perhaps someone else who was on that call (Jesse?) can say whether I'm misremembering. But it's certainly a reasonable time to revisit the issue, although it's going to be tough to discuss much without that documentation about the reasons for the tag. - J< -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
