On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 23:03 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > I don't see what changed since the discussion on JPackageNaming. The > original arguments still stand, and no further element occurred to my > knowledge to justify changing the compromise that was painfully > achieved. These reasons need to be actually enumerated somewhere, so that they can be re-examined with today's tools, and if today's tools aren't up to the task we can have a target to shoot for with tomorrow's tools. Thus far I have only seen hand wavy reasons as to why it's "needed" and no clear statements as to what problems are being solved with their existence. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
