On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:49 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > The biggest issue I could see is that any issues in handling such a package > > would need to be fixed *everywhere* that package is deployed, whether it > > be current Fedora, earlier Fedora, or EPEL. It may not be practical to > > deploy such fixes everywhere. > > Consider, for example, that such a package breaks bugzilla. Although I > suppose that's one way to avoid getting bug reports. > /me renames yum to ᶨᶬⱴ :-D -sv -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
