On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:54 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:49 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > The biggest issue I could see is that any issues in handling such a package > > > would need to be fixed *everywhere* that package is deployed, whether it > > > be current Fedora, earlier Fedora, or EPEL. It may not be practical to > > > deploy such fixes everywhere. To me, these are the least issues. They are of a technical nature and can be overcome/fixed (utf-8) My concern is usability of the distro. IMO, we can not avoid to restrict certain aspects of the distro to the least common denominator. Package-names are such a case. > > Consider, for example, that such a package breaks bugzilla. Although I > > suppose that's one way to avoid getting bug reports. > > > > /me renames yum to ᶨᶬⱴ Is this Farsi, Arab or Hebrew? Proposal: Let's rename the bodhi and koji packages + their primary executables into their Indian rsp. Japanese equivalents :) Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
